StealthBypass vs StealthWriter (2026)
These two tools are priced for genuinely different users, which makes the comparison simpler than most: StealthWriter charges more for a lot more daily capacity, and StealthBypass charges much less for a monthly pool. This page sets out what each actually costs and includes. We have not run a controlled bypass-rate test between them, so there are no pass-rate percentages here.
Where these numbers come from. StealthBypass plan prices and limits are read directly from our own billing configuration, so they cannot drift out of date. StealthWriter's figures were taken from their site in July 2026 — check it yourself before deciding, since they can change it at any time.
What both tools do
Both are AI humanizers: they rewrite text produced by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other model so it reads less like machine output, varying sentence length and rhythm and moving vocabulary away from the most predictable choices. Both include AI scanning so you can score the result before you use it, and both have a free plan that does not ask for a card.
The difference is the shape of the pricing. StealthWriter meters by humanizations per day. StealthBypass meters by words per month with a ceiling on how long any single run can be.
Pricing and limits
| Plan | StealthBypass | StealthWriter |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 3/day, 500 words per run, 2,500 words/month | 10/day, 1,000 words per input |
| Entry paid plan | $4.99/mo — 5,000 words/month, 1,000 per run | $20/mo — 50/day, 5,000 words per input |
| Mid plan | $9.99/mo — 10,000 words/month, 1,200 per run | $50/mo — 150/day |
| Top plan | $19.99/mo — 20,000 words/month, 2,000 per run | $100/mo — 350/day |
| Buy without subscribing | $1.99 / $4.99 credit packs | Subscription only |
The two are not really competing for the same buyer. StealthWriter's entry plan costs four times ours and gives you far more headroom — 50 humanizations a day at up to 5,000 words each is more capacity than most individual writers will use in a month. Ours is sized for someone with a few assignments, priced accordingly.
Feature differences that are actually verifiable
| Feature | StealthBypass | StealthWriter |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in AI detector | Every plan, including free | Including free, with sentence-level breakdown |
| Longest single run | 2,000 words (Max) | 5,000 words (paid plans) |
| Rewrite intensity control | Writing styles on paid plans | Light / medium / aggressive |
| Unused credits roll over | Lite 10, Pro 25 | Daily allowance — unused days do not bank |
| Cheapest way to humanize one document | Free plan, or a $1.99 pack | Free plan (10/day) |
Rows we removed from this table in July 2026: language counts, processing-speed comparisons, bulk-document support, and API availability. Each was stated as fact without anything backing it, and the language and speed figures for StealthWriter were guesses presented as measurements.
Why there are no bypass percentages on this page
This page used to carry a table of per-detector pass rates for both tools, introduced with a line about running fifty ChatGPT-generated essays through each humanizer. That test was never run and the numbers were not real. They have been removed rather than adjusted.
A bypass rate only means something with a fixed corpus, a named detector version, a stated pass threshold, and a date — and even then it decays, because detectors retrain continuously and without announcement. Any tool quoting a permanent “99% bypass” figure is quoting something that was never measured or has already expired. If we run a study we can stand behind, we will publish the method with the result.
Which one should you pick?
Daily pipeline, documents longer than 2,000 words, or a more generous free tier.
Lite at $4.99 or a $1.99 pack covers a deadline with no subscription to cancel.
Both free tiers cost nothing to try. Run the same paragraph through each and compare the output — that will tell you more about which suits your writing than any comparison table, this one included.
Try StealthBypass free — 3 runs a day, no card →